🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.